Font size

To magnify the text and elements, you can use:

CTRL + zoom in
CTRL - zoom out

In case of website accessibility problems, please e-mail us to You are also welcome to give us recommendations and feedback regarding your website experience.



The content of the website of the Court of Audit is designed with the purpose to provide universal access to all of the published information – to anyone, at all times, and free of charge. Since the principle of universal access is limited by the health conditions of the users (i.e. visual, motion, hearing, cognitive and linguistic limitations) and technical limitations, we paid special attention to them and tried to adjust the website by considering the following recommendations:

  • font size may be adjusted,
  • key images are equipped with descriptions,
  • there are no moving pictures (GIFs),
  • names of the links are descriptive,
  • videos are mostly subtitled.

The website is optimised for multi-device browsing (computer, tablet, mobile phone) and compatible with different website browsers and software. Recommended is the use of the latest version of website browsers whenever it is possible to provide a better support to the users with disabilities and special needs.Despite the fact that we are aiming to increase the accessibility and usability of our website to the greatest extent possible, all the elements do not provide for the optimisation of the complete accessibility.

Therefore, some published contents do not meet all the demands related to accessibility as defined by the Accessibility of Websites and Mobile Applications Act. Those deficiencies are:

  • we use PDF format for documents:
    • audit reports and other reports with short summaries that are available in text (doc and docx documents) and
    • various presentations (i.e. infographics, posters, manuals);
  • home page provides three elements with scroll box for automatic rotation with limited use of the manual override;
  • photographs and other images are used for visual supplementing of contents related to news and articles; photographs and images are subtitled, include data about source and alternative text, but do not include detailed descriptions or transcriptions of texts, since the adjustment would cause disproportionate burden;
  • schematic presentation of organisational structure of the Court of Audit;
  • documentation of concluded public calls was not adapted, since interference with public procurement documentation of completed public calls is not allowed; when preparing the next public call, we shall follow the standards of accessibility.

Letter of access


Efficiency of youth policy

Last change:
28. 7. 2017

Audit data

Audited period:
from 1. 1. 2014 until 31. 12. 2015

Decision no.: 320-3/2015/3
Date: 17. 4. 2015


Efficiency of youth policy

The Court of Audit of the Republic of Slovenia carried out the performance audit and expressed an opinion that in the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015 an efficient system for monitoring the implementation of measures and projects within the framework of youth policy was not established. The auditees were determined to be the Government of the Republic of Slovenia (hereinafter referred to as: the Government), the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport (hereinafter referred to as: the Ministry) and Office of the Republic of Slovenia for Youth (hereinafter referred to as: the Youth Office).

The EU classifies the youth field as part of national and local policy and encourages Member States to mutually cooperate in the concerned area. In the time of global economic crisis the Council Resolution of 27 November 2009 on a renewed framework for European cooperation in the youth field (2010-2018) brought to forefront horizontal issues of youth policy. The aforementioned Resolution together with Public Interest in Youth Sector Act served as the basis for the adoption of the Resolution on the National Youth Programme for 2013-2020. In 2014 and 2015, youth policy was in 99.5 percent considered as horizontal policy and aimed at integration of young people into economic community in various areas of life.

The Government, which shapes youth policy and is responsible for the existing situation and position of young people, established the Council of the Government of the Republic of Slovenia for Youth, a consultative and coordinative body for the field of youth sector. Youth policy is controlled by the Ministry, while the Youth Office carries out expert, administrative, organisational and development tasks relating to the youth sector.

The Court of Audit established that the existing rules and regulations did neither clearly define the tasks of bodies responsible for the achievement of public interest in the youth sector nor identify persons who are obliged and/or may cooperate therein and their obligations. Therefore, there was lack of cooperation between stakeholders in achieving public interest, especially between the national and municipal level. The Council of the Government of the Republic of Slovenia for Youth, the Ministry and the Youth Office did not perform their role as coordinators of youth policy between the national and local level appropriately, additionally, a coordinator of youth policy at local level was not foreseen in rules and regulations.

In 2014 and 2015, the field of youth policy was insufficiently monitored, at local level was not monitored at all. For the same period the reporting on the implementation of youth policy was not appropriate.

The Court of Audit established that oversight of the implementation of youth policy was not ensured. The Government, the Ministry and the Youth Office did not hold exact data on the amount of public funds allocated for the implementation of measures within the framework of youth policy at national and local level in the years 2014 and 2015. According to the available data, the main source of financing youth policy in 2014 and 2015 represented the state budget, namely 93.5 percent respectively 94.6 percent, while the total scope of financing varied between EUR 207 million and EUR 268 million. Other sources of financing, except for funds of the European Commission, were unused, as in accordance with the data acquired by the Court of Audit. The Government, the Ministry and the Youth Office did not dispose of data or an assessment of the scope of budgetary funds earmarked for the implementation of activities related to youth policy at local level each financial year. Additionally, financing of those activities at local level was not legally regulated.

Annual call for co-financing programmes of youth organisations and associations issued by the Youth Office is the key instrument for supporting and encouraging youth work and infrastructure. Available funds for co-financing thus amounted to approximately EUR 1,100,000 in 2014 and 2015. However, the Youth Office did not dispose of a document clearly indicating long-term development of youth work and infrastructure. As assessed by the Court of Audit, additional measures and permanent funding should be required in the field of youth work.

In 2014 and 2015, the Government, the Ministry and the Youth Office had no oversight of the types of financial aid, its total scope and individual amounts granted to young people at national and local level. The area of financial aid was within the competence of various ministries and the classification of types of financial aid was regulated by various rules. Joint record of financial aid to youth policy does not exist.

The Court of Audit assessed that it was not possible to measure efficiency of youth policy since the adequate system for measuring outcomes of youth policy had not been established and it had not been provided gathering of relevant data for measuring outcomes.

The Court of Audit demanded from the Ministry and the Youth Office to submit response reports where corrective measures to remedy the established irregularities and inefficiencies must be presented. The Court of Audit also proposed recommendations on the improvement of their operations.